Brand comparison
Puma vs Shell
Compare Puma and Shell fuel prices in Australia. Puma averages 202.8c across 41 stations; Shell averages 175.4c across 331 stations. In this data set, Shell has the lower average by about 27.4c.
Shell - lower average in this data set
Puma avg202.8 c/LShell avg175.4 c/L
across Australia - 175.4c vs 202.8c
Head to head
Puma vs Shell fuel prices
Average, cheapest and highest bowser prices plus station coverage across Australia. Brand averages are a guide; check nearby station prices, fuel grade and update time before choosing.
Puma
41 stations
Average price
- Cheapest
- 158.7c
- Highest
- 259.0c
- Stations
- 41
- Coverage
- 3 states
Shell
331 stations
Average price
- Cheapest
- 155.9c
- Highest
- 258.0c
- Stations
- 331
- Coverage
- 7 states
Shell is 27.4c cheaper on average in the current data. Check nearby stations, because prices can vary by suburb and time of day.
Explore further
More fuel price checks
Open a brand page for state, city and suburb breakdowns, or compare average prices across brands.
Puma fuel prices
State, city and suburb breakdowns
Shell fuel prices
State, city and suburb breakdowns
Compare all brands
Average prices across every Australia brand
More brand comparisons
Popular brand price comparisons
Cheapest fuel in Australia
Cheapest listed stations on the map
Fuel types explained
U91, E10, diesel, premium and LPG
Common questions
Puma vs Shell FAQ
In this data set, Shell has the lower average at 175.4c, compared with 202.8c for Puma. Brand averages are a guide; check nearby station prices, fuel grade and update time before choosing.